Wedding Photography Project

July 10, 2007

We have a winner!

In the first ever Wedding Photography Project contest, we have a winner!  And the winner is (drumroll please)…Ed Pingol!

Here is the winning entry:

ep-3.jpg

camera setting was 100iso 30th @ f19. this smooths out the water falling and also gives us enough ambient light to light the whole scenery. monica, my wife is hiding behind the falling water on the left side (notice i didn’t clone her out so you can see her head) holding a SB-24 triggered by a pocket wizard mounted on a monopod.

The reasons behind my choice are first that I thought it was a cool composition with the lines traveling around the frame, the way line of the groom’s head and neck echo the line of the rock above him, the slow shutter speed to let the water blend, the cool use of flash during the day, the educational value it has for the people that read here, and just because I liked it!

I know that contest judging is always controversial because everyone has different favorites, but I hope everyone will congratulate Ed!

A big “thank you” to  Ed Pingol, all the other entrants (I learned a bit, so hopefully others did, too), and Jim Garner the owner of the Boda bag company for putting up the prize!

July 5, 2007

The Real Final Entry

Okay, I missed an email and this is the real final entry!  This image comes from Ryan Brenizer.

rb-1.jpg

This is a photo, “Stars in their eyes,” was taken at a wedding in Litchfield Connecticut with Danny and Kelly, a great couple. No flash was used for this image; the foreground was actually in deep shadow, so I used a hi ISO to ensure that the sunlight behind them would be slightly overpowering. It was shot with the Fuji S5 Pro, which capured the dynamic range of the scene nicely. 24mm f/4 with a Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8.

July 4, 2007

A couple more for the “Cool Photo” Contest

These images come from Ellen McRayney from Atlanta.

em-1.jpg

This image was taken at the end of a reception, right before the bride and
groom made their exit. It was an afternoon wedding/reception, so there was
plenty of light coming in through the windows. I asked the bride to stand
facing the windows, which were covered by white sheerish fabric, and hold her
bouquet behind her back. In photoshop, I cropped the image to be square then
duplicated the background layer. The bride had warned me before the wedding
that she had sports bra tan lines that she would prefer not to see if possible
in her pictures. They were very evident in this image across her back and
shoulder, so I used the healing brush and patch tool to remove tan lines on the
separate layer. I put a 10 point black stroke around the square image because
I wanted there to be a definitive line where the image ended. With the white
curtains and the white dress, I felt like the items in the image needed an
ending point. Then I added a gaussian blur (again on a separate layer). This
gave a nice glow to the image, softened skin, dress, veil, including softening
the black stroke at the edge of the image. I added a black mask to the
gaussian blur layer (alt-mask icon at the bottom of layers palette for PC) and
painted detail back into the critical areas with the brush tool (flowers,
jewelry) and with a decreased opacity brush tool brought back in a little more
detail to the areas of contrast and to the bride herself.

em-2.jpg

This image was taken just after the ceremony as the bride and groom walked out of the church and it is actually my sister.  I knew that Craig and Rebecca were excited about having the Rolls to drive them from the church to the reception, so I knew I wanted to incorporate the car into the shots.  The processing was minimal.  I shoot everything RAW, so I opened the image in Bridge, bumped up the exposure just slightly and gave it a low dark vignette (-36).  Saved it and it was done.

June 29, 2007

A VERY Cool Photo Entry

This cold image comes from Petra Hall in Sweden!

ph-1.jpg

My couple Maria and David decided to get married in the coldest month of the year here in northern Sweden, i.e. in February. Not only is it cold in February, but we also don’t have many hours of daylight. It was a bit of a struggle to separate the bride’s white clothes from the snow, so I used a fill flash.  The light was very nice and soft that day mostly due to snow clouds, and the fill flash helped to enhance the dress by making it warmer in comparison to the surrounding snow and ice. In this particular image we were lucky to have the clouds scatter for a few minutes and gave us a bit of blue sky. The sky reflects on the snow and makes it blue normally, but I did make the snow even bluer in post processing, to add to the cold feeling of the image you see here.

June 27, 2007

Some more really “Cool Photo” contest entries!

These entries come from Sara at Whitebox Weddings!

wbw-1.jpg

The bride, Kristen, is an actress and a make-up junkie.  This ring shot was taken on the cover of one of her favorite books,  Making Faces, by makeup artist Kevin Naucoin.

We were waiting for Kristen to get the finishing touches on her makeup so we played around with a few different ring set ups, but this was our favorite.   Melanie is the detail specialist of our dynamic duo, so she used the Canon 5D with the 100 macro to get this fun and quirky shot.  Window light created the soft light.  There was not much to do in photoshop other than slightly adjust the levels and do a little bit of dodging and burning on the details.

wbw-2.jpg

This is a filmstrip that we created using a series of 3 photos that were taken just after Carrie and Eric’s ceremony.  They had such a cool wedding.  The weekend long event took place at a camp in the mountains of NC.  We shoot as a team.  Usually we are both shooting with different focal length lenses or from different angels, but during this moment Melanie was using the 5D with the 50mm 1.4  and I was talking to the couple…..you will never know what we were talking about, but don’t you wish you were there!  In photoshop we used some of the amazing Boutwell totally rad actions.  We like to use the boring black and white action and warm it up a bit.  We also added some grain to these images.  The filmstrip border is one of David Jay’s showit borders.

Another “Cool Photo” Entry!

These images come from Ed Pingol in San Francisco

ep-1.jpg

about 10 minutes after the sun sets is when this image was shot. it was getting pretty dark so i had to crank up the iso a bit to 800. dragged the shutter to .10th second hand held and flash was triggered via pocket wizard. the strobe used is a very old SB-24 (very cheap - buy one) mounted on a mono pod held by my lovely wife. the flash settings was at 24mm wide 1/16th power.

ep-2.jpg

shooting agains the sun, camera setting was 100iso 250th @ f/13 (i believe it was). flash setting is at full power, 50mm zoom and was triggered by pocket wizard held 5ft from the ground by my brother. my wife was just watching and holding jasmin’s purse for this particular shot. the tube was this huge-ribbed thingie which gaives us those cool circles.

ep-3.jpg

camera setting was 100iso 30th @ f19. this smooths out the water falling and also gives us enough ambient light to light the whole scenery. monica, my wife is hiding behind the falling water on the left side (notice i didn’t clone her out so you can see her head) holding a SB-24 triggered by a pocket wizard mounted on a monopod.

June 23, 2007

More Cool Photo Contest Entries!

These three are from John Crozier

jc-1.jpg

This shot is one of my favorites of the summer. Dan grew up in Chester California and since it was a small town knew practically everyone living there. This is a shot that he really wanted me to get of him and his bride Julie in this beautiful field. The barn is so old that it is considered a historical landmark. The barn had some great colors too which made it fun to include. I wanted to give this image a more vintage feel so I toned down the colors of their skintones and the sky using presets in lightroom. Next I brought it into PS and blurred the bottom with a simple feathered gaussian blur. I used a soft light layer to burn in the sky and to create a vignette. Overall I really wanted to create a very dramatic, vintage, and romantic feel to this image. I like their pose which is both simple and elegant. The way that I shot it it almost appears as if they are elevated or levitating. I did this by laying in the grass, (something I do often) being careful to avoid snakes and other things that bite. Overall this image really works for me. I hope you like it.

jc-2.jpg

This shot was taken on the Chihuly bridge in Downtown Tacoma. It is fairly experimental for me because I rarely play with slow shutter speeds. I decided that a dead center composition would make the image fairly interesting. I focused my camera, set it to f/22 1/10s and fired away at 5fps. right at this moment the brides veil blew off. I like the capture. The processing is an extreme version of a sunset/xprocess effect that I have been working on. In PS I open a color balance tab and then select the highlights button. I then add yellow and red. I do the same to midtones. With shadows I add cyan, blue and green. This turns highlights yellowish and adds a xprocessed look to shadows. There are a lot of things wrong with this image such as the blown out sidewalk, and the blown dress. I like it because it is so different from what I usually shoot.

jc-3.jpg
This shot was taken at the same wedding. This is in Tacoma at the Glass museum. There are three things that I love about this image.
1. The muted colors. I love the color of the stairs and the color of the tower.
2. The lines. The lines on the tower and the lines of the stairs all lead towards the couple.
3. I didn’t notice this ’til now but there is a definite “S” shape formed by the reflection of the clouds in the tower.

Processing was rather simple. I started in LR with one of my vintage presets. Then in PS i burnt in the tower and pulled out a little more of the blue of the sky.

December 1, 2006

Speeding Up the Workflow!

Article by Cory Parris 

Improving Your CS2 RAW Workflow With Pre-sets

 

How is it that some photographers claim that they get done with their post-processing so fast? How do I do all my post-processing for 600 photographs in three hours?

 

Hey, I thought you’d never ask. The answer really is quite simple. Pre-sets in Bridge. This is also the same concept Adobe is using with their new Lightroom project. By using pre-sets, you can bypass the slow and tiresome Adobe Camera Raw (ACR) window.

 

The first step to working with Bridge is to set up your processing defaults. You can see that I have mine set up to do a lot of the work for me. I find that it is faster to let Bridge adjust the Exposure, Shadows, and Brightness automatically. I have White Balance, Hue, Contrast, and Saturation set to a specific value.

canon-eos-30d-020cr2-iso-400-1-200-f-28-17-5555-mm-11-30-2006-7-26-54-pm.jpg

You will have to play with your setting until you get them perfected how you like them. A couple of tricks that I use is the lens correction tab to add a soft vignette to each images and I bump up the contrast and saturation to give it the pop that I love. Once you have it the way you like it, save the default setting by clicking the triangle just to the right of where it says Camera Raw Defaults and clicking “Save New Camera Raw Defaults”. You will have to do this for each different camera model (5D, 30D, etc.) that you use.

Now, let’s make sure the pre-sets we are about to use will show up when we want them to in Bridge. You will need to go to the Edit menu in Bridge and choose Preferences. Then click on the Advanced option in the list on the left. The screen below will show up (you may need to click on it to make it big enough to see). Make sure that you have the “Double click edits Camera Raw settings in Bridge” and “Use Distributed Cache When Possible” options are checked. This will make things work correctly.

preferences-12-1-2006-8-42-16-am.jpg

Now that you have that done, you need to save some presets. Probably one of the first that you will want to set up is a b&w preset. It is possible to create some great b&w settings in bridge by desaturating and adjusting contrast. You can also use the calibrate tab to adjust the tones in the image in a way similar to using filters with black and white film. Once you have your recipe created, you need to save it by clicking the arrow just to the right of where it says Image Settings in the drop-down menu.

canon-eos-30d-037cr2-iso-400-1-40-f-28-17-5555-mm-11-30-2006-8-01-40-pm.jpg

Choose the option Save Image Subset. When the next window pops up, choose only the check boxes that apply to the recipe that you want to save. In this case, it is saturation and contrast. save-settings-subset-12-1-2006-9-02-29-am.jpg

Click Save and give it a name that you will easily be able to recognize when you see it. For this one, you might try “B&W - Basic”. That way you can keep all of your B&W actions together.

Now when you are in Bridge, you should be able to right click on any image thumbnail and see “B&W - Basic” as one of your options! Cool. Now repeat this process of saving presets for anything you normally do. I have them for exposure (-2.0, -1.5, -1.0, -0.5, -0.0, +0.5, etc.), brightness, contrast, curves, white balance, multiple b&w, a kind of cool sepia-ish muted color (true sepia is impossible to create in Bridge as far as I can tell), color pops, high contrast, and cross-process effects. And they are all point and click.

Another cool thing about this sort of processing is that the concepts and even some of the settings will be useable in Lightroom though you will have to go through the process of creating the presets again.

If you don’t want to create your own presets, you can purchase them from Kevin Kubota and David Jay. Good luck and let me know how it goes!

Cory Parris is wedding photographer in Seattle, Washington. He loves his wife, his kids, owning his own business, and photography. He is constantly mixing them together to see what he comes up with!

You can find Cory on the web at www.coryparris.com and here!

November 27, 2006

Old School Exposure by Bruce L. Snell

I think we are all guilty of it and probably do it more often than we should. No, it won’t make you go blind (at least I think it won’t). No, there’s really nothing wrong with it but wouldn’t you really rather do it the way nature intended? Of course you would, so turn off those darn automatic settings on your camera and take charge of your exposures!
1.jpg
Way back when I began my professional career as a photographer I used pretty much the same gear as all the other wedding and portrait shooters. These cameras generally didn’t have any automatic settings and very few had internal light meters. Solid exposure was determined by using a handheld incident light meter or sometimes a handheld spot meter. Once the exposure was determined the settings were transferred to the camera by turning one dial for the shutter speed and another for the aperture. It didn’t take long before you could easily predict the exposure without even getting the light meter out and taking a reading. I’m sure this sounds like a royal pain and that it must slow you way down during a fast paced event like a wedding, but the reality was it didn’t and in someways was faster than how most photographers work today. How can that be? Read on.

2.jpg

Generally the light in a scene isn’t constantly changing. The only time I can think of is outside under fast moving clouds with the sun ducking in and out. The point I’m driving toward is that if you measure the light in any given scene it’s fairly constant. If you are indoors it may be that the light is brighter over by the window than it is near the back of the room you are in, but that’s not what I’m talking about. Consistency. The light levels, while different throughout the room, will generally be consistent. If you know the exposure over by the window and in the back of the room, then you can easily shoot without a meter as long as it’s consistent light. Over by the window it’s giving you 1/500 at f2.8 and near the back it’s at 1/125 at f2.8. Cool, then set your camera to either setting depending on where you are shooting. Why is this good? Read on.

3.jpg

When you shoot in manual mode, you are in the driver’s seat and the camera will behave as you have directed. If you were shooting in an automatic mode, then the camera is constantly looking for the best exposure and changing your shutter speeds and apertures. This lacks consistency and can often lead to more work in post production. Let’s say for the sake of the article that you are shooting on automatic and your exposure is staying around 1/60 at f2.8 in the bride’s dressing room. She throws on that big beautiful white gown and your camera sees all that white and freaks out. Why does it freak out? Because camera meters want everything to be medium gray. Most scenes average out to medium gray and in those cases it works just fine, but when they don’t it’s not good. So back to the dress. She throws that dress on and the camera says, “Wow, that’s a lot of light reflecting back at me. It’s really bright so I better lower the exposure.” Is that what we wanted? No! The white dress IS bright and we want to keep it that way. If you were shooting in manual mode, the camera wouldn’t react to the dress. It would deliver the exposure you requested. Need more examples? Read on.
4.jpg

OK, we know that camera meters want everything to read as medium gray. Keeping that in mind, you are shooting a few group shots outside the church after the wedding. Your camera is on auto and you are a happy camper clicking away. Then you group all the groomsmen in their black tuxes together for a quick shot. You take the pick and find out it’s overexposed? Huh? You are in automatic and the camera meter saw all that black and said, “huh, who turned out the lights? I better brighten this up” and bingo, you’ve got a beautiful, washed out frame. If you had shot in manual based on a reading of the scene (using a handheld meter or histogram or whatever) then you exposure for the groomsmen would have the same as it was for all the other groups. Easier? You bet. Faster? Definitely. Less post processing? For sure

.5.jpg

Automatic cameras, zoom lenses, TTL flash all lead to laziness during shooting and much more post processing in the end. Shooting in manual mode is not difficult at all and makes the whole take so much more consistent. If you have consistency, then you can easily batch and adjustments in Photoshop, which will save you tons of time no mater whether you shoot RAW or JPEG. So go old school. Turn off all the automation and use your brain. It’s good for you AND your exposures.

-Bruce L. Snell

Bio: Bruce L. Snell (www.blsphoto.com) has been professional wedding photographer for over 20 years and lives in Topeka, Kansas with his wife Karen. Bruce is also co-owner of That’s My Monkey which is a website offering tips and techniques to digital photographers in a unique and humorous format. www.thatsmymonkey.com

Powered by WordPress